Myths of Hedge Funds
WSJ has a great article about Myths of Hedge Funds.
Myth #1: Hedge Funds are all the same. There are up to 25 different hedge-fund strategies which include funds invested in equity (both long and short), bankruptcies, mergers and acquisitions, high yield debt, bank debt, currencies, commodities, convertible debt, mortgage backed securities, trade claims, options, derivatives, volatility, etc. Each strategy has its own risk factors, return history, etc. Smart investors should heed the Socratic maxim of hedge funds — Know Thy Strategy.If you found this post helpful, consider donating to my coffee fund!Myth #2: Hedge Funds are too risky. This is perhaps the biggest myth of all. For the first five years of this decade, hedge funds have returned a 7% (approximate) compound annual rate of return while the S&P has returned -2.2% per year. These positive returns in a bear market demonstrate that the funds are able to produce higher returns with less-than-market risk.
Myth #3: Hedge Funds are too expensive. No doubt about it. Index funds and mutual funds can be purchased at much lower fee structures. But to savvy investors that’s not the issue. The key question is, net of fees, where do I want my capital invested? Hedge-fund fees are high as they are meant to compensate the top investment talent available. The question isn’t, are hedge funds expensive? But rather, are the fees worth it? The market is saying yes.
Myth #4. Hedge Funds are secretive. Not so. Hedge funds are sold through privately distributed prospectuses which carefully describe, among other things, the fund’s investment parameters, terms of investment, redemption rules, conflicts of interest, as well as the backgrounds and track records of key personnel. In addition, the funds provide annual GAAP audits detailing their assets. Many, although not all, funds disclose their portfolio holdings upon request. A fund that failed to provide this information would have a minimal chance of raising meaningful capital.
It is true that this information is not publicly available. This is not because managers are secretive, but rather because the funds are privately offered and SEC rules prohibit managers from making the information available.
Myth #5: Recent Hedge Fund regulations will prevent fraud. There is no reason to believe that recent SEC regulations will prevent fraud. Funds can avoid regulation by imposing a two-year lock-up on capital raised on or after February 2006. It is safe to assume fraudsters will avail themselves of that loophole. What the new regulations have done is to reduce the liquidity normally provided to investors. Funds of funds now have to choose between allocating to funds which impose two-year lock-ups (as many of the top funds are now doing) thereby reducing investor liquidity rights, or selecting funds that are not their “first choice” but will register and provide annual liquidity. That means that in the name of “protecting the public” the SEC just reduced the liquidity available to funds of funds and hedge-fund investors. While fraud will never be entirely eliminated, continually evolving due diligence and other best-practice standards should reduce the scope and frequency of fraud.
Myth #6: Funds-of-funds investors need more regulatory protection than hedge-fund investors. Of the $1 trillion in hedge funds, approximately $335 billion comes from funds of funds. Most funds of funds require individual investors to be qualified purchasers (those with $5 million or more in investable assets), so they don’t prey on widows and orphans. Less than 3% ($8 billion) of all capital invested in funds of funds is estimated to be in publicly registered “fof” vehicles where investors who are not qualified purchasers can invest. Hardly worth a new regulatory scheme. In fact, like hedge funds, funds of funds provide monthly track records, annual audited reports and detailed prospectuses which disclose conflicts of interest, investment terms, etc. Fund-of-fund annual reports are required to disclose any investment that exceeds 5% of total assets. Many funds of funds are fully transparent.
Myth #7: Hedge Funds destabilize markets. While the collapse of Long Term Capital Management in 1998 was immensely destabilizing for the markets, it is really the exception that proves the rule. Most funds run modestly leveraged, since they do not want to incur a loss large enough to jeopardize the franchise. Today hedge funds are a key source of liquidity for the markets. They make markets more efficient, and can create value, since they often actively unlock corporate value by pressuring managements to make necessary changes. Would you rather buy a stock owned by a passive mutual fund or one owned by hedge-fund managers insistent upon corporate responsibility?
![[del.icio.us]](http://images.del.icio.us/static/img/delicious.small.gif){kind=small}
- How Passive Is Your Passive Income? I've been lumping in my online income with my passive income, but it isn't really passive. It may not be very strenuous and it gives me geographic flexibility and I don't have to show up for work every day, but there is some effort involved. Unfortunately I'm not as clever......
- 10 Reasons Why Gold Should Break $1000 This Year Today's guest post comes from Bruce, CEO of Superior Gold and includes a free silver coin! For many years I was a successful real estate investor. However, I realized that the market was getting very speculative and decided to get out while the going was good. In 2003, I sold......
-
How Does Your 401k Compare? I have a 401k from a previous employer. With only a dozen mutual funds to choose from, it doesn't have very many investment choices. I've done the best I can from these choices and have selected 8 of them, with 75% of my 401k invested in just 3 funds. And......
Related Websites
- Hedging Against the Declining Dollar Last week I published a tip on how an investor can concurrently hedge against inflation and currency risks. This week Peter Navarro, one of my favorite economists, published an interesting video that does two things. First, it explains why there is likely to be a general trend of a declining......
- Investing In Bonds: Make Money The Boring Way Could your Scottrade (or other investment) portfolio use a dose of bonds? We often cover the world of equity investing here, and we’ve also discussed safer investments like the stable certificate of deposit. This time, we thought to cover some fixed income investing basics. I suppose if we categorized all......
- Mutual Funds Introduction It is really not much of an exaggeration for you to say that mutual funds are one of the best things that the middle class can take advantage of financially since the invention of sliced bread. What mutual funds do, is they allow for investors that have small amounts of......
[All content is copyright of Living Off Dividends & Passive Income]
August 7th, 2006 at 3:58 am
Yes, I am one of those people ( a lot of people believe that the rates are going lower in the mid to long term). Yes also inflation is higher now than a few years ago. The Fed will end up cutting rates in the near future and longer term bond yields will likely fall at that point. The fact that the yield curve is inverted shows that the average long-term bond buyer is not concerned about rising inflation and that despite the rising price of oil we are in a deflationary/disinflationary period still. Technological change is rapid and together with global integration of markets is causing wages and output prices to grow slowly. I don’t think we will see inflation much higher than this in the next couple of years. If the Kondratieff theory is correct we won’t see inflation levels like the 1970s or 80s for another couple of decades. History doesn’t have to repeat though…
So, if you had the money would you invest in a hedge fund?