Are Jim Cramer’s Stock Picks Worthless?
According to a recent article by Barron’s Magazine title The Cramer Effect (& Defect), readers who follow Jim Cramer’s stock picks from his show are more than likely to lose money in the long run.
We also looked at a database of Cramer’s Mad Money picks maintained by his Website, TheStreet.com. It covers only the past six months, but includes an astounding 3,458 stocks — Buys mainly, punctuated by some Sells. These picks were flat to down in relation to the market. Count commissions and you would have been much better off in an index fund that simply tracks the market.
When we asked Cramer and CNBC for their own records of Mad Money’s stock-picking performance, they had more excuses than a Tour de France cyclist dodging a blood test. They complained that the list from YourMoneyWatch.com contained some stocks from the program’s “Lightning Round,” in which Cramer gives a quick analysis and a buy or sell decision on stocks phoned in live by viewers. These, they argued, shouldn’t count in our tally.
CNBC officials also said that viewers should buy Cramer’s picks a week after they’re aired. They said that the show is mainly educational, and not just about stock-picking. In the end, they said we should focus only on the tiny universe of stock selections — about 12 a week — that Cramer researches the most. And we should do it only for the issues picked this year. CNBC analyzed these stocks, and said that if held for one month, they beat the S&P by 0.8%, or 1.7% after two months. They offered no results for the year-to-date.
It turns out that CNBC did its analysis incorrectly, and that the stocks beat the S&P by 0.4% in one month and 1.2% over two months. CNBC measured the stocks’ performance against the average performance of the S&P year-to-date, instead of against the performance of the S&P from the date of each stock pick. Also, it included more than 100 recently recommended stocks that weren’t held for the full one- or two-month holding period that CNBC claimed.
More important, the stocks fell short of the S&P by a statistically significant 2.2% through last week.
Our question is: How are viewers supposed to know that they should pay attention only to this subset of stock picks each week and ignore the thousands of others that Cramer makes on his show?
Then there’s the day-after-pop phenomenon. Our analysis of Cramer’s picks over the past two years, from YourMoneyWatch.com, showed that, on average, the stocks jumped 2% the day after he mentioned them. From there, they usually moved sideways or down for the following 30 trading days (see chart). This offered an opportunity to make money — 5% to 30% a year — by selling Cramer’s selections short.
Cramer agrees that there is a shorting opportunity in the temporary effect he has on stocks — a trade that he’d jump on if he still were at a hedge fund. “If you short the bump, you will do well,” he said last week. “I’ve said it on the show many times.”
I really don’t think people should be taking stock tips from a guy who has about a minute to analyze the stocks on his show. He may be a really smart guy but how can he properly evaluate a stock in the short time period he has?
I hope there aren’t too many people who base their stock investing solely based on his recommendations. But if they’re that ignorant or lazy, I guess they get what they deserve!
If you found this post helpful, consider donating to my coffee fund!![[del.icio.us]](http://images.del.icio.us/static/img/delicious.small.gif){kind=small}
- The Weakening Dollar - II Now we've seen some reasons for the Dollar's continued weakening, how do we profit from this knowledge? Here's a compendium of worthwhile investments that I've been researching. Invest in foreign currencies and foreign bonds If your bank allows you to make foreign currency deposits, that may be the simplest solution.......
- Where To Invest Your Can't Lose Money? Here's an interesting excerpt from an MSN money article this month.One fund that didn't notice was Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX).Welcome to a home for your serious money -- the money you can't afford to lose. Launched in 1982 as an antidote to that most dreaded of economic conditions, stagflation, Permanent Portfolio......
- Common Sense Advice For Investing In The Stock Market Given the poor performance of the stock market in 2008, its time to go back to the investment basics and make sure you don't forget the important stuff. 1. Only invest in companies that pay a decent dividend (at least 3%) and that have a long history of increasing their......
Related Websites
- Piqqem: Crowdsourcing Stock Picks Last week, I was contacted by Piqqem. Then wanted to tell me about their service and get my thoughts. I have to admit that I didn't find the Piqqem site that interesting. I love the idea of crowdsourcing, but it seems to me that the stock market is already and......
- Jim Cramer's Tips For Picking Stocks to Buy. I've just finished re-reading Jim Cramer's Real Money: Sane Investing in an Insane World and thought I would share some tips I found inside. This is a suggested list of the types of stocks to buy for a diversified portfolio. 1. Buy local. Cramer recommends that you buy stock in......
- Book Review: Common Sense On Mutual Funds I began my personal finance education by reading Suze Orman's "The Money Book for the Young, Fabulous & Broke" to get a good overview as I began my personal finance journey. I then read two books on investing in the stock market. William Bernstein's "The Four Pillars of Investing" and......
[All content is copyright of Living Off Dividends & Passive Income]
August 27th, 2007 at 9:24 am
Jim’s the type of guy you either love or hate. If you watch his show to get quick tips to try and make a buck on –you wll lose. If you pay attention to his picks, do the homework and trade/invest wisely, Cramer is a great resource.
September 14th, 2007 at 11:46 am
I agree. Jim’s show is great, but you shouldn’t make your stock picks solely off his advice. Especially not the lightning round.
And in my opinion, the lightning round should not count in his performance. His performance should only be based on the stocks he does in-depth segments about (like when the show first starts off).
October 28th, 2007 at 8:45 pm
No matter what anyone says I will always have a deep respect for Jim Cramer. He has been such a successful trader that the SEC has effectively banned him from having a personal trading account. Instead he has a Charitable Trust where he donates the money he makes.
As for his performance…the only fair way to determine that would be to have him pick 10-12 stocks quarterly and track their performance. No matter how intelligent someone is they can’t possibly remember EVERY stock in the market. Most people call in on the lightning round with completely bogus stocks that are frankly, junk. I’ll bet half the people don’t even want an opinion, they just want to hear cramer say buy or sell to get the stock to move the following day. Some people are basically trying to manipulate trading. (Cramer buy recs pop in after hours trading)
Records might prove me wrong, but I would guess cramer gives MANY more sell recs than buys. When the overall market is rising these sell recommendations go against him. (He has knowingly been doing this even when he has publicly stated how incredibly bullish he was on the overall markets.)
Hope these points make you think twice about Cramer – because I believe he is truly a financial genius.
-calven
-http://www.Chartsetups.com
September 16th, 2009 at 10:40 am
Is Jim Cramer good at picking biotech stocks? Mentor Capital (MNTR) is currently funding the breast cancer research of Quantum Immunologics, a privately held company with the agenda of marketing their immunotherapy cancer treatment the sensitizes dentritic cells in order to expose cancer cells so the immune system can fight them. I sure could use some advice from an investor with his record.