US Inflation Much Higher Than Reported: Get Ready For 10% Inflation
Today’s post is an excerpt from a letter by Martin Hutchinson. He’s done a great job of explaining why interest are so low and why inflation will probably run 10% pretty soon.
Back in the early 1990s, the Fed and its chairman – Alan Greenspan – had a problem. And it was a big one. The central bank tried to maintain a low rate of money supply growth, as Fed predecessor Paul Volcker had pioneered, but this was causing problems. Even though inflation appeared under control, economic growth remained stuck in low gear – even long after the nadir of the 1990 recession. President George H.W. Bush was seriously annoyed, as he had right to be: After all, that slow economic growth probably cost him the 1992 election.
Accordingly, Greenspan in 1993 abandoned monetary targeting, asserting that for some unspecified reason [but one that was doubtless highly technological] money supply aggregates had become inaccurate, so it was better to target inflation directly. However, inflation showed signs of turning up, so in 1994, the Fed was forced to tighten again, slowing growth once more. No fun at all.
The solution was to move the goalposts. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, which measures inflation, suddenly found a great interest in “hedonic pricing” – essentially an assessment of the pleasure people gain from the goods and services they consume.
The idea behind this is quite simple – essentially that the satisfaction derived from a particular good does not remain the same if the quality increases through better technology. Shouldn’t that quality increase be counted as the equivalent of a price decrease?
The most exciting application of this premise was a concept called “Moore’s Law” in the high-tech sector, where microprocessor power was doubling every two years or so. If you pretended that this doubling in chip speeds also doubled “hedonic” output, you could also pretend that the price had been halved. If you then rebased all weightings on the 1st of January of each New Year, you could then take the effect of these repeated “halvings” in tech-sector hedonic prices. If each halving took the tech sector from 5% to 2.5% of the economy, then after 10 years you would have halved prices over fully 50% of the economy.
Doing this is completely spurious – for one thing, it ignores the negative hedonic effects to consumers of such nuisances as customer call centers and automated telephone systems – but it has allowed the BLS to report inflation at about 0.8% to 1% less than it otherwise would have been in every year since 1995.
Conversely, since inflation is lower, using that artificially lower number to get a “real” economic growth figure will produce a growth figure that is artificially higher. And that’s why we had the so-called “boom” of the late 1990s, and the apparent boom since 2000 – even though neither really seemed to make consumers any richer.
Needless to say, politicians love this stuff! It enables them to trumpet the new, higher growth rates and the new, lower inflation rates every time they run for re-election. It also makes improvements in the U.S. economy look much better than its European Union and Asia counterparts, which haven’t adopted “hedonic” pricing.
But the game may finally be up. Even hedonic consumer price inflation is running at 4.1% in the last 12 months, so with interest rates at 3.5% for the benchmark Federal Funds Rate and about 3.6% for 10-year Treasuries, interest rates are now significantly below the inflation rate.
That means savers are getting an even worse deal than they usually get.
It also means inflation is almost bound to accelerate. By definition, if borrowing costs are less than zero, people will find ways to borrow and will waste the money they have borrowed. Unless the BLS finds some new trick to avoid reporting inflation, it is likely to rise rapidly towards 10% or so in the months ahead.
Whats the best way to hedge against this?
Hutchinson suggests the following:
1. Avoid TIPS (Treasury Inflation Proofed Securities).
2. Consider investing in Rydex Inverse Government Long Bond Strategy C Fund (RYJCX) is a fund designed to move inversely to Treasury bonds.
3. Buy gold.
4. Jump on Japan by buying the ETF JSC, which consists of smaller companies with little or no exposure to the global markets.
- China Pulls Out The Heavy Ammunition! According to the Telegraph,The Chinese government has begun a concerted campaign of economic threats against the United States, hinting that it may liquidate its vast holding of US treasuries if Washington imposes trade sanctions to force a yuan revaluation.Two officials at leading Communist Party bodies have given interviews in recent......
-
Counter Argument to China's Threat To Dumping US Dollars/Treasuries/ A few days ago,China threatened to offload its Billions of US Treasuries in retaliation to any US imposed trade tariffs.One of the newsletters I read regularly is from John Mauldin who doesn't think its likely that China will follow through with their threat.China has an estimated $900 billion in US...... - Why Inflation Is Bad When the Fed prints more currency notes (to pay for the war and the interest on all the T-bills we've dumped on the rest of the world) it devalues each existing dollar in circulation. This is an inflation in the money supply and its bad for us in the long......
Related Websites
- Economists bank on interest rates to tumble in 2009 Interest rates are ready to tumble again after Christmas, according to City experts. The Bank of England interest rate stands at 2% - the lowest since 1951. The 58 economists, polled by news agency Reuters yesterday, feel the rate will fall to 1% by March, and will stay there until......
- Consumers Need to Exercise Caution as Credit Card Rates Climb Many consumers are finding that even though they have had the same credit card for years, and have paid the balances off completely every month, their monthly statements are suddenly appearing with a surprise: An interest rate hike by as much as three percentage points. Some consumers are not worried......
- Introduction to Mortgages pt 4 of 5 This is part four in a five part series on what you need to know about mortgages before you buy a home. The housing market is an interesting beast, because it comes and goes, rises and falls, allows some people to flourish and brings others to ruins. If you want......
[All content is copyright of Living Off Dividends & Passive Income]






January 24th, 2008 at 12:01 pm
And don’t forget some time back the government switched to a substitution method for calculating inflation.
So last year steak was $2 a pound and this year its $4. You can’t afford $4 so you substitute hamburger (which is now $2 a pound) for stake. This equates to 0% inflation, because you pay the same amount for a substitute good that addresses the same need.
Next year hamburger inflates to $4 a pound, and Spam to $2 a pound. So when you can no longer afford hamburger, you substitute Spam. And again, the government reports 0% inflation.
Meanwhile the actual price of that steak you used eat has inflated 400% over 2 years. So you have to pay 4 times as much for same quality of life, or cut you quality of life by 1/4.
I think many government entitlements are tied to inflation. So keeping that number artificially low translates into millions and millions of dollars the government doesn’t have to pay out.
It kind of like big stakes 3-card monte.
January 25th, 2008 at 10:11 am
first of all, the article fails to explain why 10% is a likely rate for inflation to hit. This seems to be a completely arbitrary forecast.
secondly, where did you get your hedonic inflation quote of 4.1% for the last 12 months?
If the Fed already uses hedonistic pricing to determine prices for their indexes, shouldn’t the hedonistic inflation rate be 2.85% (http://www.inflationdata.com/inflation/inflation_rate/CurrentInflation.asp) for the previous 12 months? and then shouldn’t the non-hedonic inflation be 2.85% + 0.8% or 1.0%? Which would put T-bills at about a zero sum inflation hedge?
All in all, I think a 10% inflation rate prediction is doom saying.
January 30th, 2008 at 6:56 am
All of this will ultimately lead to stagflation which we have seen in our past is only fixed with sky high rates and a fantastic clunker of an economy while it tries to “reset” itself.
January 30th, 2008 at 10:59 am
Mike,
Sadly, I must concur with your opinion.
Nirav.
February 7th, 2008 at 5:34 am
A prediction for higher inflation is a good case for taking out as large and as long-term a mortgage as you can. Keep your payments low to provide flexibility in the case of job loss. This is not to say you should buy the largest home you can afford…
As for the Rydex Inverse Government Long Bond Strategy fund… The expense ratio is awfully high and it has 12b1 fees. I’d almost rather buy short-term bond funds where the prices won’t get hit as hard by rising interest rates and you’ll receive the benefits from them in higher yields quicker.
We live in interesting times…
February 25th, 2008 at 6:56 pm
Great post. Could you kindly tell me where to get more resource on this subject? thanks
June 23rd, 2008 at 7:16 am
Hi, was anyone able to get the previous poster any resources on the subject? in particular any one know of any resources pertaining to Euro area and Asia position on adopting this hedonic pricing?
August 23rd, 2009 at 11:19 am
I have a BA in Economics. I was taught that when you increase the money supply you create inflation. I believe the Federal Reserve is holding the US rates low artifically because we would not be able to pay the interest on the debt. The truth is we are already upside down and without the Fed we would be in hyperinflation right now. We are in a house we owe to much on. The Scariest part of this is that hyperinfation my be our only way out. It would monitise the debt and make us appreciate and respect a balance budget.