Residential Housing To Drop Another 25%
Since 2005, I’ve been saying that San Diego home prices are way overpriced and are due for a 40-45% correction. The homes are so far out-of-whack thats it’s 30-50% cheaper to rent than it is to buy. Of course, the National Association of Realtors (the cheerleaders of the real estate world) will always tell you its always a good time to buy, but anyone who can use a calculator might think otherwise.
Already in most parts of San Diego, home prices are down 20-30%, unsold inventory has sky-rocketed, and real estate is no longer the main topic of cocktail parties.
Someone recently asked me if I though it was a good time to buy in San Diego. Houses in a Cardiff/Solan Beach/Encinitas/Pt. Loma that were $800-900k during the peak were now in the $600-700K range. When would we see the bottom?
I obviously thought it made sense to wait until the prices overshoot fair-value and become undervalued. Real estate has a tendency to keep moving in a trend for a very long period of time. Once its started to go down, it’ll just keep on heading in that direction. The Federal Reserve may try to give the bust a ’soft landing’ but that won’t have much of an effect. It’ll probably just increase the duration of the downturn, similar to what happened in Japan after their real estate market crashed and was depressed for 15 years.
BusinessWeek finally has an interesting article about the Housing Meltdown: Why home prices could drop 25% more on average before the market finally hits bottom..
Even Mike “Mish” Shedlock thinks that home prices will reach more reasonable levels in 2009. Nice to finally see some corroborative data from an economists point of view.
How many of you think the bottom is in 2008?
If you found this post helpful, consider donating to my coffee fund!![[del.icio.us]](http://images.del.icio.us/static/img/delicious.small.gif){kind=small}
- How I Started Investing In Real Estate src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> In September 2000 i caught the flu and while I was probably well enough to go to work, I decided to take a week off and relax. I spent a whole week sitting in Barnes and Nobles reading all sorts of business and investing books. That week I......
- Ben Stein Not Hot On Real Estate Here's an excerpt from Ben Stein's column about why he thinks real estate isn't such a great investment.That means the house has kept up with inflation -- barely.In fact, when I do the math, I realize that it hasn't fully kept up with inflation. Plus, the owner would have had......
- Real Estate and Taxes No one likes paying taxes, especially not real estate investors. Luckily, congress has been kind and offered a lot of tax breaks. Whenever you make a profit in real estate, there's usually a way to avoid or atleast defer paying taxes. The most well-known tax break is the 121 home......
Related Websites
- Investing 101: Real Estate (It's that time again; time to be subjected to get to enjoy another rousing episode of Investing 101! In this edition, we're going to look at one of the most commonly touted investments: real estate! There's a good chance that might already have dipped your foot into real estate investing,......
- The Number One Mistake that Would-be Real Estate Investors Make I met with my friend's wife this weekend to learn more about her thriving real estate business. She helped to confirm what I suspected to be the number one mistake that new investors make: they expect to make good returns by paying "retail" prices for real estate. By "retail" prices,......
- Real estate: Asset or liability? Flexo takes issue with Robert Kiyosaki's definitions of asset and liability: An asset is something that puts money in my pocket. A liability is something that takes money out of my pocket. I can see Flexo's point in that Kiyosaki is recasting the definition of the words. The proper financial......
[All content is copyright of Living Off Dividends & Passive Income]
February 8th, 2008 at 12:33 pm
The bottom will definately not be in 2008. I would bet every last dollar I have on that.
On top of that, even when the bottom hits, it’s not going to bounce. Historically, when real estate goes down, it stays down for a quite a while. It does not move as fast as the stock market.
February 22nd, 2008 at 2:01 am
I don’t see how it can bottom in 2008. Despite lower rates, there are still not enough buyers and too much inventory (and phantom inventory).
Like increases, asset price declines tend to be self-reinforcing trends. The more illiquid the asset, the longer the trend. If stock markets have a 2 year down cycle after a major run-up (1973-1974, 2001-2003), housing seems likely to be down for 5-10 years (1988-1995).
If the banks continue to struggle with quarterly write-downs eliminating profits, credit will remain difficult to obtain for any but the most solid buyers.
March 11th, 2008 at 1:09 pm
I don’t think we will see a bottom until 2011. I have written a few posts about it on my blog.
Nice to see some corroboration from you, EmptySpaces, since you are far closer to the market than I am. It only makes sense that prices have to overshoot to the downside. Its a mean-reverting series, so overshoots in one direction have to be offset in the other, and buyers simply have no incentive to purchase an asset with 4-9 times leverage when prices are falling because of the loss of equity. This will only make sense when prices fall so low that investing for cash flow with modest leverage produces reasonable returns.
I do think we are headed for a Japan-like price deflation which is the usual aftermath of a major fall in leveraged asset prices and that this down cycle will be extremely bad.