Obama Says “We Buy Ugly Houses”!
Source: Miz Duke
As everyone knows the only thing wrong with America right now, is the lagging economy. If we could only boost our economy and increase our GDP we’d be able to unleash prosperity on everyone. So building on the resounding success of its “cash for clunkers” program, the Obama administration just announced a cash for junkers or “we buy ugly houses” program. Since the median home price is about 10 times that of a median priced car, the government will offer 10 times the rebate for the purchase of a new home. Other than that, the “cash for junkers” program is identical to the preceding program:
- If you “trade-in” your old home, you’ll get $35,000 towards the purchase of a brand new one
- If you had a jumbo-mortgage or your house was over 5,000 square feet, you qualify for $45,000
- You must have owned the home for at least 1 year to prevent misuse of these funds
- The “trade-in” house must be bulldozed and the debris shipped off to China
- If your house is worth more than the rebate amount, you’re out of luck!
The government has earmarked $20 billion for this program and it estimates that the sales of 500,000 homes will cannibalized this year from future sales numbers. Wait, did I say cannibalize? My apologies, I meant to say that the demand for 500,000 new homes would be created. The total effect will be to boost the economy by $100 billion dollars or nearly 0.7%! Since the destruction of the existing houses doesn’t count in GDP numbers it’s a net positive result!
The GDP is a number that calculates the amount of services and goods produces without the effects of taxation, so the negative effect of an extra $20 Billion burden on the taxpayers (or their unborn grandchildren) isn’t a part of the calculation either. So you see, it’s a win-win situation for everyone!
What’s that? Who do I mean by everyone? I mean the administration and the small sub-section of the population who own sub-$35,000 homes who are able to go out and get $125,000 mortgages. Now I’m not sure whether these are low-income families or rich slumlords, but that discussion is merely an academic argument.
Not only that, but demolishing the existing homes would help reduce the old inventory thats casting a dark shadow over the entire real estate industry. So this we buy ugly houses program would really help the economy’s green shoots sprout in to a young sapling. What’s that you say? We need job and income growth to actually boost the economy. No, that was the old economy. This time it’s different!
If you found this post helpful, consider donating to my coffee fund!![[del.icio.us]](http://images.del.icio.us/static/img/delicious.small.gif){kind=small}
- Housing Update From WSJ Todays WSJ had a decent article on housing, 'Housing Glut Gives Buyers Upper Hand'. Seems like certain parts of the country are in for a bumpy ride. Here are some excerpts.*A quarterly survey of housing conditions in 28 major metropolitan areas by The Wall Street Journal showed that the inventory......
- Monthly Passive Income Finally Breaks $3,000 Barrier! A few of my readers have emailed me asking when I'm going to post the Passive Income numbers for June. Apologies for the delay; I'm going to be starting my full-time MBA at UCLA pretty soon and I've had to look for apartments in Los Angeles so I've been pretty......
- Dollar May Weaken I regularly read the 'Daily Pfenning' by Charles Butler of Everbank.com.Today's issue was especially bearish on the dollar.The Yen finally started to move back up hitting a one month high over the weekend on speculation the Bank of Japan report tomorrow will show an improved economic outlook. The BOJ will......
Related Websites
- How to Combat Rising Home Heating Costs This Winter If you have opened up any major newspaper in the last few weeks, chances are youâll have seen some sort of article indicating that the cost of keeping your home warm during the winter would be increasing dramatically, especially if you use home heating oil or propane. Consumers who use......
- Let's keep the savings rate going up Sun's Financial Diary posted a graph on the uptick in the US national personal savings rate. It's reached a 7-year high, breaking 3%. This is a far cry from the 1970s and 1980, when the savings rate was north of 10% of disposable income. Over the past fifty years we......
- Stimulus 2009: Five Programs that Congress Forgot It's hard to believe that within the confines of $819 billion of new spending, hundreds of pages of legislation, and 32 new government programs, Congress forgot to provide money for some very worthy causes. Clearly this was mere oversight. So Mr.ToughMoneyLove has decided to dedicate this entire post to......
[All content is copyright of Living Off Dividends & Passive Income]
August 5th, 2009 at 11:34 pm
lol, love it
August 6th, 2009 at 3:27 am
is this a joke?
August 6th, 2009 at 6:20 am
YES! Obama is my hero. I won’t have to pay for my mortgage, or worry about my bills… Obama is going to take care of me!
The government is awesome! I hope they spend 10 TRILLION dollars to fix the economy. I mean, the principles are the same for 10 TRILLION and 10 BILLION.
haha!
August 6th, 2009 at 7:48 am
“is this a joke?”
What’s the difference?
August 6th, 2009 at 8:40 am
yes, it is a joke – but sadly there is no difference
August 6th, 2009 at 8:44 am
Interesting and cynical. You know what, as a long time reader of this blog I would like to request for you to write a post. I think you pretty much know what you are talking about when it comes to economics.
So, I would propose that you write your own economic plan for the U.S.
What do you say?
August 8th, 2009 at 3:03 am
[...] Introduces “Cash For Junkers” [...]